Flaming via Reputation System & Incorrectly Signing Neg Reps.

[Rolk]

Alrighty. I've had to give out a few points to people who are breaking the rules thinking it's okay to flame people through their reputation.

This is still flaming, and I am willing to go through people's reputation to view who is doing it and hand out warning points. I've done it twice within the last week already and people should know better.

Another problem is incorrectly signing Neg Reps to entice members to flame the person they're signing as. This won't be tollerated either. If it continues then the people involved will be named and shamed. Stop trying to make other people look bad.

If anyone has any questions feel free to post them here, if you have been flamed through the Rep system, feel free to PM me and I'll look into it.

[SunnyInc.]

I'm all for public naming and shaming.

[SgtRicko]

Didn't really think that this issue of anon. neg reps was that serious, but damn.



Oh well, you gotta do whatcha gotta do to keep the peace, right Rolk?:\

[Rolk]

Anon neg reps are the way to go. Basically you're not claiming to be anyone else, if you get what I mean.

However, say someone signed a neg rep in your name, enticing the person to change their view of you and start to bite back, thats what I want to avoid by letting them know that their name and who they claimed to be will be announced.

Mind you, I've seen two people sign reps as Sunny trying to entice people.

[KrasnyOktyabr]

Mind you, I've seen two people sign reps as Sunny trying to entice people.

Says a lot about that persons character, doesn't it.