View Full Version : Bush Declairs War on Fire
Zancloufer27
11-14-2007, 02:24 PM
Click Me (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/UnNews:In_response_to_widespread_devastation_in_California%2C_Bush_declares_war_on_fire)
Bush announced that he was declaring a global war against all forms of fire, as it "Is a major menace to society and must be destroyed completely. We will live in a world completely free of any fires!!!" Several thousand army troops were sent into California the instant Bush declared war. "Fire is a tough opponent," says one soldier, "We dropped about 800 bombs on the fire yesterday, but they didn't seem to make any difference. As a matter of fact, I got the impression that they were only serving to make the flames bigger."
:lmao:
Derek
11-14-2007, 04:04 PM
Oh, good old Uncyclopedia! :lol:
So, whose going to be the first idiot to think that this is a serious article?
ein1017
11-14-2007, 04:18 PM
shhuuuush derek, don't tell them :shifty:
Nod Fanatic
11-14-2007, 06:42 PM
God, I love Uncyclopedia! :rofl:
SgtRicko
11-14-2007, 11:53 PM
Oh, good old Uncyclopedia! :lol:
So, whose going to be the first idiot to think that this is a serious article?
Given my past experience, probably FOX news, that or some obscure far-left group that thinks Bush is evil and will post absolutely anything negative on him without checking their source.
Gaucho8788
11-15-2007, 02:51 AM
That was the great. I needed a good laugh.
SunnyInc.
11-15-2007, 04:44 AM
Seeing as shooting fire will never kill it, as shooting it or bombing it merely creates more, this global war on fire is unlikely to end anytime soon. However, this prospect does not seem to have entered the mind (?) of President Bush, who has announced that after the fire in California is out, the United States (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/United_States) will be invading a volcano.
Ownage to the power of pwnage!
Nice find zan.
Statalyzer
11-15-2007, 09:56 AM
Given my past experience, probably FOX news, that or some obscure far-left group that thinks Bush is evil and will post absolutely anything negative on him without checking their source.
So basically one way or the other, it will be a major news channel?
Desolator12
11-22-2007, 04:05 AM
So basically one way or the other, it will be a major news channel?
No, just Fox. Remember when they did the segment on Anonymous: The Domestic Terrorists. "They get what they call 'lulz'"
NuclearDreams
11-22-2007, 07:59 AM
Gee, I guess then CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS are all virgin news stations that have never made complete asses of themselves.
example:
http://edition.cnn.com/US/9807/02/media/
In Google type your favorite major news affiliate or anchor associated with that affiliate, type "retractions" at the end...press enter.
SgtRicko
11-22-2007, 01:59 PM
Gee, I guess then CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS are all virgin news stations that have never made complete asses of themselves.
example:
http://edition.cnn.com/US/9807/02/media/
In Google type your favorite major news affiliate or anchor associated with that affiliate, type "retractions" at the end...press enter.
It's not that they're perfect, its just that FOX tends to screw up the worst, and most memorabily, that's all really.
vBulletin® v3.8.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.