Lion's Daily Blurb - Mon., Tues., Nov. 3-4

[Lion]

Here we go with the start of a new week, and here in the USA we will be electing a new President on November 4th. That is of course IF everything goes smooth and legal. I'll be glad when it's all over and it's a done deal. Anyhoot, the good news is gas prices continue to drop in my neck of da woods. We're now below $2.50 a gallon. In about two weeks after I get caught up on some of my work, I'm gonna take a couple day trip to the Eastern shore whilst the gas prices are still down. I had planned on going back in September but got tied up with work. Well, at least the beach won't be crowded. I mainly go to smell the salt air, check out the boats, feed the seagulls, and of course sample some of the good food. :yummy:

[Slapper]

Good luck over there neighbors. Hope it all works out for you and the rest of us that do not live in the U.S. nothing like fresh seafood on a fall day. Enjoy it Lion. Wish i was there, i am a seafood lover as well.

Gas prices have fallen from 1.45 a litre a month ago to about a national average of 95 cents a litre in the past month, that is a goodthing indeed. but it wont last and this happeneing only shows all of us how bad it has become, it has fallen because noone is buying it, at least not like they were. Consumption is down, that is the reason why.


As far as it being all legal like, i wouldnt count on that. Here something i watched last night, sink your teeth into this if ya got time, its scary to be honest.

http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/invisible_ballots.php

or

http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/hacking_democracy.php

or even

http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/votergate.php

and the piece de la resistance, this is how Bush got in. He didnt actually win, he cheated, and i think after watching all of this, its kind of hard to deny it.

http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/unprecedented.php

I know, im a link whore, but i like to be informed, since my job requires me to know all i can about who, what ,when, where, how and why. It also helps me sleep at night, hoping im doing the right thing and im on the right side. sometimes i wonder when i see see things like this. When a Congressman owns the company who makes the voting machines used in his district and are used in his election process, how in the hell is that not a conflict? what???? is that what it come down to? people being this naive? i refuse to believe 90 per cent of Americans are morons, but please, really, how does this happen and why is nothing done? Fair elections? i think not.

Im sure some people will watch this stuff and come up with the usual nonsense about how its conspiracy theory, blah, blah. That is not unexpected, i know from experience most people do not think thier Government or Politicians would stoop to these levels. This should be a wakeup call to those who think otherwise.

[Derek]

and the piece de la resistance, this is how Bush got in. He didnt actually win, he cheated, and i think after watching all of this, its kind of hard to deny it.
lol. Just admit it, people liked Bush in 2004, and Kerry was terrible.

[Slapper]

Hehe, hiya Derek, good to see your still around.

Well, i was not around much during that election, didnt know much about Kerry, i was out of Country during that time. But regardless, after what i saw and the debacle associated with that election, i still maintain it was stolen and the votes not counted in Florida and the Black People being disqualified at the polls by the thousands, and the irregualrities in the voting process, well, that is not Free and Fair Elections by any standard of comparison.

But, thats my opinion. As usual, your quite entitled to yours. But i think its again a case of people not wanting to believe that thier Politicians would do such a thing as fix an election. i dont have that kind of trust in suits and never have. for good reason in my mind.

[truefeel]

I heard something about to. Although I'm sided to think that it is true, I will not take it for granted completely. However It is quite believable that bush won his second election unfair. Sorry if I offend somebody, but you could just as well put a chimpansee behind the presidental desk. You would not know the difference.

I hope also it does happen (if it happened), but I think not. This election has alot more attention then the previous one and I also believe that the people are watching out for fraud.

[berlin88]

Slapper, the voting fraud was in the 2000 election when the courts said Bush won.

However, here are some things to keep in mind.

1. We have both the popular vote and the electoral college. Republicans prefer the electoral college given to us by the founders, while the Democrats prefer the popular vote. Both parties argue that their prefered method should be used to decide who becomes President.

I prefer the electoral college, because the founders of America intended for that to be what decides who becomes President, not mass populism. The founders intended for educated and informed individuals to from across the nation to help decide who becomes President, not whichever guy is more popular.

Some politicians have proposed we award the electoral vote to the winner of the national popular vote, meaning your state could vote for one party, but have the electoral votes given to the other party. This would be a gross violation of the Constitution, and I oppose it.


2. The Supreme Court has a long history of rewriting and reinterpreting the Constitution, they did it all the timer during the 20th century, allowing the progressives to rewrite and reinterpret it.

BOTH Political parties have appointed party loyalists to the Supreme Court in the form of textualists and Originalists for the Republicans and living constitutionalists and others for the Democrats. The parties only appoint someone who is going to rule their way on the major issues.

For instance, NLRB v Jones and Laughlin Steel reversed 150 years of Supreme Court precedence by legalizging the new deal! Previous Supreme Court cases like Schecter Poultry vs US had ruled 9-0 the new deal was illegal, but President Roosevelt threatened to pakc the courts with New Deal supporters, so the court gave in and ruled the New Deal legal.


3. In 2000 with Bush v Gore, the Republicans used the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment to justify throwing out ballots. Democrats on the court had a long history of supporting equal protection, but they opposed it because they didn't want Gore to lose.

4. There were voting disputes back when John F. Kennedy ran versus Richard Nixon, nothing that changed the outcome of who won, but voting problems jus the same.


5. We need to wipe the slate clean and start over! Just revert back to the original document our founding fathers gave us, and start from there. BOTH parties have rewritten and reinterpreted it so many times that the founders would probably be amazed at what it looks like now.

[ein1017]

So you want to go back to a time where women could not vote? reverting back to the original would not really solve anything. Like I said before, the Constitution was made to be flexible with the changing times. the founding fathers did think it would last long in it's original state.


Glad the gas prices are dropping but I hope we don't take this as a time to relax on finding ways to replace oil where ever we can.

[Derek]

1. We have both the popular vote and the electoral college. Republicans prefer the electoral college given to us by the founders, while the Democrats prefer the popular vote. Both parties argue that their prefered method should be used to decide who becomes President.
Actually the majority of both parties support the popular vote, Democrats somewhat more so than Republicans but thats probably just due to latent resentment over 2000 (if a Democrat had one the electoral vote but not the popular in 2000, then Dems would probably be more in favor of the electoral). The only strong opposition to changing to the popular vote comes from politicians themselves, its a lot cheaper for the parties to run Presidential campaigns in a few swing states than all over the country. Thats why you won't hear anyone from either party advocating a change.

[truefeel]

Slapper, the voting fraud was in the 2000 election when the courts said Bush won.

There are also rumors and such that the one of 2004 didn't went clean either. There had been messed with the votes.

[berlin88]

There are also rumors and such that the one of 2004 didn't went clean either. There had been messed with the votes.

Yes, but its just that rumors. What credible evidence do you have to support your claim? Decision must be based on logic, evidence and common sense, not mere rumors or morality.

Politicians want you to believe and blindly follow whatever they say. They try to sway our vote with one liners and morality. If we required the politicians to go into detail during the debates, their moral arguments would quickly collapse and logice/ evidence would derail many of their arguments/ ideas.

What I want to see in a Presidential debate is one of the old style Lincoln Douglas debates where each candidate gets on stage and speaks for 90 minutes on whatever topics they want, with no moderators or prearanged topics/ questions. When you only speak for 2-5 minutes, you cna throw out a moral argument and win, but when you have to start going into detail with evidence/ facts, morality doesn't always hold up to scrutiny.

[truefeel]

Yes, but its just that rumors. What credible evidence do you have to support your claim? Decision must be based on logic, evidence and common sense, not mere rumors or morality.

Politicians want you to believe and blindly follow whatever they say. They try to sway our vote with one liners and morality. If we required the politicians to go into detail during the debates, their moral arguments would quickly collapse and logice/ evidence would derail many of their arguments/ ideas.

What I want to see in a Presidential debate is one of the old style Lincoln Douglas debates where each candidate gets on stage and speaks for 90 minutes on whatever topics they want, with no moderators or prearanged topics/ questions. When you only speak for 2-5 minutes, you cna throw out a moral argument and win, but when you have to start going into detail with evidence/ facts, morality doesn't always hold up to scrutiny.

I said they are rumors. Such a thing is very difficult to make hard. However a few things would point into the discussed direction:
-Alot of irregularities were reported after the elections
-A professor from the USA claimed that there was alot being frauded with votes; I can't correctly how and what he said precisely, however
-It's pretty unbelievable people would vote for someone who is so dumb and ignorant.

I will not take it for granted only b/c there's no direct proof. Howver, election frauding has happened in the past in the USA (Nixon) and I think Bush was capable of doing that.

Also note that from politicians very little protest came from against this.

[Mpdabunny]

I mainly go to smell the salt air, check out the boats, feed the seagulls, and of course sample some of the good food. :yummy:
Pffffffft! We all know you go to feed the tourists to the gulls. You've already admitted to it. We all know of your french fry antics. :D

As for the election BS, I'm with you. I'll be very glad when it's over. I stopped watching the news and giving a damn about it over two weeks ago. I've been fed up with it for... when did the primaries start? lol :doped:

[Derek]

-It's pretty unbelievable people would vote for someone who is so dumb and ignorant.
You do realize that you're talking to people who voted for him, don't you? When people say things as stupid as that, it just goes to show how ignorant they are about politics.

[berlin88]

You do realize that you're talking to people who voted for him, don't you? When people say things as stupid as that, it just goes to show how ignorant they are about politics.

Who exactly are you refering to with that statement?

Bush won the 2004 election because the Democrats ran John Kerry, rather than risk a big name Democrat. Most voters saw Kerry as being about the same as Bush, and decided to stick with the guy already in office. Perhaps if John Kerry had been able to distinguish himself from the pack and convince voters he was a much better choice than Bush, he would have won. However, he didn't and just came across as more of the same or only minor improvements, and many voters believed there was little difference between the two.

A quote from Cool Hand's Luke could sum up Kerry's problem "What we have here, is a failure to communicate".

People were not convinced by Kerry's statements, didn't fully understand where he stood on the issues. The GOP portrayed Kerry as a riddler and a flip flopper, and it worked, because Kerry couldn't convince the voters otherwise.

Voter Fraud can go both ways, just look at all the Tameny Hall/ big city politics that plagued major cities like Chicago, Boston and New York. Power currupts people and absolute power corrupts all the time.

Lastly, sometimes its simply the Political parties shooting themselves in the foot. For instance, the Democratic Farm Labor party in Minnesota nominated Al Franken for senate! They made a big stink about how bad Norm Coleman is and how we have to vote him out of office, and they offer Franken as an alternative. Had they picked even a semi decent candidate, the DFL would have won in a landslide, but they picked Al Franken and now are going to pay the price when he is defeated by Coleman.

[nilloC]

lol. Just admit it, people liked Bush in 2004, and Kerry was terrible.

Yikes, I have major issues with that statement. It wasn't as much people "liked Bush", rather why change horses midstream? We were a year and a half into the Iraqi War. Kerry was not at all a formidable candidate (Hell, I really didn't like the man, but compared to Bush I for sure voted for him. Shows my disdain for the Bush Administration.). People who weren't quite as liberal as I decided to vote for Bush based purely on the fact that they just didn't care. It was far from them actually liking Bush.

Popular vote was quite close if I recall correctly(not like 2000, but still close). I'm surprised so many people voted for Kerry, as he really was worthless (yet in my opinion I would rather have his administration in charge than Bush's; purely my opinion.).

Anyways, if you're an American citizen and over 18 you better vote tomorrow. There's no excuse for not voting.

Enjoy the East Coast Lion, thank goodness gas prices are a droppin'!

[starscream007]

Tomorrow is going to be really interesting.

[nilloC]

Tomorrow is going to be really interesting.

QFT!

If everything goes as planned, collectivization should start early in February. ;)

[eLDiablo]

Tomorrow is going to be really interesting.
another day, another rigged election.

[KrasnyOktyabr]

-It's pretty unbelievable people would vote for someone who is so dumb and ignorant.

You've got such a way with words.

I voted for President Bush in 2004, and looking back I don't regret it. I've also already cast my vote for Senator John McCain, absentee ballots for the win.

[truefeel]

You do realize that you're talking to people who voted for him, don't you? When people say things as stupid as that, it just goes to show how ignorant they are about politics.

All I am saying is that Bush never should had came to power in the first place. He had a "relative good" reputation back in 2004, so it's a bit understandable that he got voted; It's just a bit unbelievable he made it with the blunders he made before the elections of 2004 (9/11 the biggest one of them all).

You've got such a way with words.

I voted for President Bush in 2004, and looking back I don't regret it. I've also already cast my vote for Senator John McCain, absentee ballots for the win

That's your right to do so. But I do think alot of other people will regret it.

[starscream007]

Barr got my vote and Im damm proud of it.

[Slapper]

Well, seems we have our winner at this point, America voted for change, im just not so sure its going to change anything.

Talk is what it is, talk. Politicians are all windbags, period.

Oh and ElDiablo, i just visited your blog, you are one funny sumbiatch...LOL. I love your attitude, you should run for Pres or guest star on a Penn and Teller Episode...You call the BS the same way. I love it. Now added to my favorites. Nice one.

[Pr0SEAL]

Ron Paul was right, there is no change on the horizon. Obama is going to get it worse than Bush, because he won't handle the Federal Reserve. Plus his tax plan is shady, and will punish success while keeping jobs over seas. Time to reform the Conservative/Libertarian movement back to the Free Market, Limited Government, Dollar backed by Gold and Silver, Non-Intervention Foreign Policy, Constitution Ideology, and undo the Great Society to get back to the Found Father's Free Society. Ron Paul 2012! Campaign for Liberty Continues! Liberty and Freedom!